Funny enough, I had someone try to claim they 100% knew something I wrote a long time ago was AI-written, which I 100% with, based on their use of an AI detection tool to prove their case, when the reality is these tools are unreliable at the end of the day.
What the tool actually ended up flagging was the proclivity of my dyslexia to show up in my earlier works, but at the end of the day, the writers most negatively impacted by this are going to be at-risk writers, aka young writers, writers with learning disabilities, ESL writers, but it begs the question, who is the real target, even?
So I am not misunderstanding--your old work rated higher on "ai-detection" tools because how your dyslexia affected your writing was more prelevant then?
I had no idea about the groups more likely affected by false positives using "detection" software. That's horrible.
(My extent of knowledge about genAI is that it is a tool to mimic human language.)
Comment on Protect Your Contact Information From Scammers
Yemi Hikari (Yemi_Hikari) Wed 24 Sep 2025 06:01PM UTC
Comment Actions
fallofman Thu 25 Sep 2025 09:15AM UTC
Comment Actions